Totally fair! I just prefer strategy games ultimately. Circling back to the root of the conversation -- since Celebrities is a strategy game like Stars was, a 6-person finale would be meh imo. Of course it's a public game, but strategy has always been a big part of it (well, a part of Stars) malibu
Honestly, the large number of finalists is part of the turn off of a regular BBUK to me (and the fact they can't strategize like tf??). But there does need to be 3+ noms for when ties occur, if it's possible. I think that'd be a cool step away from the Tengaged Stars model it appears to be based on in a regular week.
Comments
I do agree it wouldn’t be a good idea on here, I would love to see the 3 noms thing though when ties happen krisstory
By
Malibu,
10th of November 2025
Totally fair! I just prefer strategy games ultimately. Circling back to the root of the conversation -- since Celebrities is a strategy game like Stars was, a 6-person finale would be meh imo. Of course it's a public game, but strategy has always been a big part of it (well, a part of Stars) malibu
By
krisstory,
10th of November 2025
It's not a strategy game 😭 krisstory
By
Malibu,
10th of November 2025
That's because they can't strategize! Lol BBUS at final 6 is plenty interesting in comparison malibu
By
krisstory,
10th of November 2025
krisstory the last week is always slow cuz there's not much going on between 6 people, less would be too boring
By
Malibu,
10th of November 2025
Honestly, the large number of finalists is part of the turn off of a regular BBUK to me (and the fact they can't strategize like tf??). But there does need to be 3+ noms for when ties occur, if it's possible. I think that'd be a cool step away from the Tengaged Stars model it appears to be based on in a regular week.
By
krisstory,
10th of November 2025
Teaaa and some twists along the way
By
Malibu,
10th of November 2025
Yessss
By
CharliXCX,
10th of November 2025