On a day off like today, I prefer peace, quiet, and not wasting my time, but when someone keeps making dozens of people uncomfortable and then acts shocked that nobody enjoys it, I’m done pretending it’s harmless. @MessyJ, this is about you. You have a new habit of following people game to game like a pop-up ad nobody asked for, then acting personally victimized when they don’t respond to your schmoozery. This isn’t a participation-trophy forum. Nobody owes you engagement, attention, or emotional labor, especially not over a game. Calling someone like @leehoyminoy “unstable” because they didn’t play along to your demands is certainly a choice. And the pattern is exhausting. You antagonize, poke, lie, twist words, then suddenly discover selective silence the moment someone holds you accountable. Funny how accountability is always optional when it’s inconvenient. You only pick battles you think you can win, and when you can’t, you vanish like a browser tab you forgot you opened. Let’s talk about the unsolicited “love,” the <3 spam, the fake sweetness sent to people you openly say you hate. You sent me 3 of those in the past 24 hours, but in the past 2 games with you, publicly campaign that you "hate" @High and me, so why on earth do you send such uncomfortably "I miss you"-like messages? Unsolicited affection isn’t kindness, it’s boundary cosplay. You send hearts like they’re apology coupons. They don’t redeem. Peace and love doesn’t count if nobody consented to receiving it. Before anyone jumps in with “you’re just stirring drama,” no. This isn’t about popularity. @MessyJ isn’t well-liked here, and I’m not pretending I am either. The difference is I don’t hide. What you see with me is what you get. If I’ve got an issue, I say it to your face. I don’t haunt threads, provoke people, then clutch pearls when they finally respond with the same energy. And yeah, lately dozens have noticed the elephant in the room. There have been long-standing community concerns connecting MessyJ to a former user, JesseM, who was removed from past sites over serious issues. I’m not playing detective or making legal claims. But when behavior keeps repeating and the names are literally just the initials flipped, people are allowed to feel uneasy. That’s not drama, it's simple pattern recognition. If people keep backing away from you, maybe it’s not a conspiracy. Maybe it’s feedback that your cringe behavior needs to change or get the fuck out. Here’s the part that really matters: online spaces still require consent. Consent to interact. Consent to engage. Consent to receive your messages. This site isn’t your emotional escape room, and people don’t exist to solve you. Fake sweetness doesn’t cancel out real discomfort, and harassment with a smiley face is still harassment. If people have you blocked on 2 platforms, why do you reach out on a third and try to schmooze them there for attention? Calling people unstable, inserting yourself where you’re not wanted, and choosing when to engage based on whether you’ll “win” isn’t community behavior. Being loud doesn’t make you right. Being persistent doesn’t make you welcome. If every room you enter suddenly feels tense, maybe you’re the common denominator. So this is me being very clear, very transparent, and very done: learn how to exist in shared spaces without making people uncomfortable, or stop inserting yourself into other people’s orbit. You’re not being misunderstood, Messy, you’re being seen. Can we please stop pretending that these patterns are new and this is a first-time blog?

a peach twisted tea and a klondike bar

has anyone frequently used the furni shop or house feature?

I should absorb all of @Noah’s points and designs

is anyone awake rn