Menu

Games

+ Enrol in a game
Loading your games...

(VOTE HERE)PUBLIC HELP #MM6

Rio 2 months ago55 views

Me and the #MASTERMIND team are thinking about changing how a master mind of the round is defined; currently it's random, as are the next 3 nominees. But we're thinking of changing it and having the master minds of the round won on merit with challenges of answering quickly or answering correctly first. Nothing more than that, no prolonged challenges or ones that require a lot of time to decide. So what do you think? https://kovaze.com/group/43

HOW CAN WE DECIDE MASTER MINDS ROUNDS

Please log in to vote on this poll.

View Results
14 votes, 110 points

Comments



AMANDA2 months ago

Random means anybody can win

Rio2 months ago

AMANDA good

AMANDA2 months ago

If it’s quick response then 2 people can just run the whole game

Rio2 months ago

AMANDA But if everyone is active and attentive to the challenges, anyone can respond faster than the other. This would give advantages to people who like to pay attention to all the game's movements. But I liked your point of view; it just explains why you say that only 2 people can win the whole game?

AMANDA2 months ago

RANDOM!!!!!!

Rio2 months ago

AMANDA computed