Broken House/Draft Feedback
AMANDA
TLDR: 3 noms until late endgame, keep the 1 vote it differentiates Celebs from Stars which was a very stale game, MORE PURGES!!!! Draft is lowkey problematic and needs balancing asap. I loved this format lol I’m saying keep the Broken House twist full stop. One vote per person is iconic and chaotic because you can’t hide behind other votes. The people who complained about the format didn’t understand how to strategize in it and got evicted bc of that. Do 3 noms until the final 6-7 then switch to 2 noms. Also every Celebrities should have a surprise Purge round at some point. That was like the greatest part of the game by far and the most fun day in the house even tho the result was awful for my game. As somebody who made like 10 different Stars finals…… getting to the end of Celebrities was the most rewarding by far. The format makes big alliances impossible and 1 vote per person really makes it an individual game and not a team game. Stars as a game was not very great but the continuous nature of the game & inability to evict your fellow players due to the public is what makes it so thrilling and a spectacle. Broken House makes sure that majority alliances can only last like 3 rounds max before they’re forced to nom each other. Results being AT day change needs to be a standard for all Celebs games. You can renom people by all means but you have to predict who will stay AND risk self voting if they’re evicted. Whoever disagrees with this one is just straight up wrong and wants the game to be less challenging. Now the draft. It needs to be reworked before it flattens Celebrities. Either cap the number of users who can draft a player or use some mathy dynamic pricing model where higher demand players cost more or have a lower payout if they win. It’s nice to incentivize more players to interact with the game via votes. But it’s a less interesting voting system when users are incentivized to only save the people they predicted would win day1. The voters are trying to win the draft and making rational decisions based on that instead of who they support more. This gives advantages to front runners that they do not need. If I’m gonna get strangers saving me because they drafted me then my opponent should have the same chance with strangers who drafted them. Otherwise it only makes the game easier for the predicted winner. The current incentives structure is actually pretty miserable to play under if you don’t have a ton of people drafting you (aka the new players and underdogs). By final 6 the twist got old (I mean I got nommed so) and I do think 2 noms is the only appropriate thing to do at final 5 and 4. Otherwise no notes Sin you accidentally designed one of the greatest games I’ve ever played lol thank you so much baby Tagging my fellow top 5nalists batya notnicky333 @lexeyjanereal @pdubs5000 Celebrities winners I would love your feedback as people who played different formats than us sexytex naughtynacho nikky cherry brat Bagel Kemi @Coke events ppl krisstory and sobriquet wanna see ur thoughts too EDIT: And better payouts would be gr8 because this game is hard as fuck & the endgame players could kinda get more than they do. I get the winner prize being so much bigger so maybe just the 6th-4th payouts could be better. More coins for 3rd/2nd would also be great but not trying 2 be greedy D: